<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Reverse Reference Fallacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2009/12/15/the-reverse-reference-fallacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2009/12/15/the-reverse-reference-fallacy/</link>
	<description>The theology of Reality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 22:49:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deacon Duncan</title>
		<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2009/12/15/the-reverse-reference-fallacy/comment-page-1/#comment-18140</link>
		<dc:creator>Deacon Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/?p=1181#comment-18140</guid>
		<description>Shhh, Rev. Moon isn&#039;t ready to have the full revelation released to the public yet....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shhh, Rev. Moon isn&#8217;t ready to have the full revelation released to the public yet&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikespeir</title>
		<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2009/12/15/the-reverse-reference-fallacy/comment-page-1/#comment-18138</link>
		<dc:creator>mikespeir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/?p=1181#comment-18138</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s just contrive something we&#039;ll call &quot;canonical context.&quot;  We&#039;ll say that the whole Canon was inspired by one Mind, and what that Mind thought of 3000 years ago was only meant to be fully revealed a thousand years later as the True Teaching came to be realized.  There, wasn&#039;t that easy?  We can hardly miss with that kind of hermeneutic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s just contrive something we&#8217;ll call &#8220;canonical context.&#8221;  We&#8217;ll say that the whole Canon was inspired by one Mind, and what that Mind thought of 3000 years ago was only meant to be fully revealed a thousand years later as the True Teaching came to be realized.  There, wasn&#8217;t that easy?  We can hardly miss with that kind of hermeneutic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2009/12/15/the-reverse-reference-fallacy/comment-page-1/#comment-18107</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/?p=1181#comment-18107</guid>
		<description>Well said. Even though I&#039;m now an atheist (for about 2 years), it was easy to see the fallacy in your first example (from Matthew), but harder to see it in the second (from Ephesians). This is a powerful fallacy indeed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said. Even though I&#8217;m now an atheist (for about 2 years), it was easy to see the fallacy in your first example (from Matthew), but harder to see it in the second (from Ephesians). This is a powerful fallacy indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

