<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: XFiles Friday: The Ultimate Superstition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2009/04/17/xfiles-friday-the-ultimate-superstition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2009/04/17/xfiles-friday-the-ultimate-superstition/</link>
	<description>The theology of Reality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:15:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: exrelayman</title>
		<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2009/04/17/xfiles-friday-the-ultimate-superstition/comment-page-1/#comment-8710</link>
		<dc:creator>exrelayman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 04:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/?p=884#comment-8710</guid>
		<description>I see. Being a MILITARY COMMANDER AND CONQUEROR explains being more influential than being GOD MANIFESTED. Superb logic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see. Being a MILITARY COMMANDER AND CONQUEROR explains being more influential than being GOD MANIFESTED. Superb logic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facilis</title>
		<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2009/04/17/xfiles-friday-the-ultimate-superstition/comment-page-1/#comment-8602</link>
		<dc:creator>Facilis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 03:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/?p=884#comment-8602</guid>
		<description>Wow. a whole lot of logical errors here. I will try to keep up.

&quot;It’s ironic, because I really doubt that David Hume would find himself at all discomfited by the latter day superstitions that try to make the Big Bang an argument for a Creator,&quot;
David Hume&#039;s whole argument was that the universe was like an animal that lived forever and could grow and increase in complexity. Modern astrophysics that shows the universe clearly is not eternal and certainly is not an animal and bitch-smacks Hume in the face.

&quot;when in fact it eliminates the possibility of a Creator.&quot;
Exactly how does it? I think it fits in nicely with creation.

&quot;Mohammed has had almost as much influence, in only two-thirds the time, without even rising from the dead.&quot;
That is because of course Mohammed was A MILITARY COMMANDER AND CONQUEROR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. a whole lot of logical errors here. I will try to keep up.</p>
<p>&#8220;It’s ironic, because I really doubt that David Hume would find himself at all discomfited by the latter day superstitions that try to make the Big Bang an argument for a Creator,&#8221;<br />
David Hume&#8217;s whole argument was that the universe was like an animal that lived forever and could grow and increase in complexity. Modern astrophysics that shows the universe clearly is not eternal and certainly is not an animal and bitch-smacks Hume in the face.</p>
<p>&#8220;when in fact it eliminates the possibility of a Creator.&#8221;<br />
Exactly how does it? I think it fits in nicely with creation.</p>
<p>&#8220;Mohammed has had almost as much influence, in only two-thirds the time, without even rising from the dead.&#8221;<br />
That is because of course Mohammed was A MILITARY COMMANDER AND CONQUEROR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parker</title>
		<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2009/04/17/xfiles-friday-the-ultimate-superstition/comment-page-1/#comment-8570</link>
		<dc:creator>Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 05:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/?p=884#comment-8570</guid>
		<description>CL! You filthy bastard! I didn&#039;t realize you had your own blog. Looks like I&#039;ve got some reading to to do! ;-)
Cheers to all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CL! You filthy bastard! I didn&#8217;t realize you had your own blog. Looks like I&#8217;ve got some reading to to do! <img src='http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Cheers to all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cl</title>
		<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2009/04/17/xfiles-friday-the-ultimate-superstition/comment-page-1/#comment-8564</link>
		<dc:creator>cl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/?p=884#comment-8564</guid>
		<description>( / hiatus ) Good wrap-up DD, although I had some serious concerns about this post as well. I enjoyed the X-Files series, and am mainly breaking hiatus just to compliment you on it, notably the tenacity it takes to git&#039;r&#039;done. Overall, say you were successful, but of course I disagreed here and there. Specifically regarding today&#039; post, I agree that claims do not entail verification - but you also flanked G&amp;T&#039;s valid rebuttal to Hume with Benny Hinn, and offered an inverse First Cause argument that I have some legitimate scientific questions about. My full response is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thewarfareismental.info/the_warfare_is_mental/2009/04/miraclequest-continues-my-response-to-the-ultimate-superstition.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, it be interesting to hear any responses. ( hiatus )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>( / hiatus ) Good wrap-up DD, although I had some serious concerns about this post as well. I enjoyed the X-Files series, and am mainly breaking hiatus just to compliment you on it, notably the tenacity it takes to git&#8217;r'done. Overall, say you were successful, but of course I disagreed here and there. Specifically regarding today&#8217; post, I agree that claims do not entail verification &#8211; but you also flanked G&amp;T&#8217;s valid rebuttal to Hume with Benny Hinn, and offered an inverse First Cause argument that I have some legitimate scientific questions about. My full response is <a href="http://www.thewarfareismental.info/the_warfare_is_mental/2009/04/miraclequest-continues-my-response-to-the-ultimate-superstition.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>, it be interesting to hear any responses. ( hiatus )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tacroy</title>
		<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2009/04/17/xfiles-friday-the-ultimate-superstition/comment-page-1/#comment-8560</link>
		<dc:creator>Tacroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/?p=884#comment-8560</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
I’ve seen countless examples of people giving God the credit but never the blame in all sorts of things (e.g., “miraculous” survival stories in disaster situations)
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Even worse - it&#039;s always &quot;Thank you God for saving me from that potentially fatal car accident!&quot; and never &quot;What the heck God, why did You blow out my car&#039;s tire?&quot;

If God is responsible for saving us from terrible situations that are beyond our control, then he&#039;s &lt;i&gt;just as&lt;/i&gt; responsible for putting us in those situations in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
I’ve seen countless examples of people giving God the credit but never the blame in all sorts of things (e.g., “miraculous” survival stories in disaster situations)
</p></blockquote>
<p>Even worse &#8211; it&#8217;s always &#8220;Thank you God for saving me from that potentially fatal car accident!&#8221; and never &#8220;What the heck God, why did You blow out my car&#8217;s tire?&#8221;</p>
<p>If God is responsible for saving us from terrible situations that are beyond our control, then he&#8217;s <i>just as</i> responsible for putting us in those situations in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David D.G.</title>
		<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2009/04/17/xfiles-friday-the-ultimate-superstition/comment-page-1/#comment-8556</link>
		<dc:creator>David D.G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/?p=884#comment-8556</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen countless examples of people giving God the credit but never the blame in all sorts of things (e.g., &quot;miraculous&quot; survival stories in disaster situations), but I have never heard of this &quot;ultimate superstition&quot; concept before, in which Jesus gets all the credit for good social development while the rest of humanity gets all the blame for its bad aspects.  It&#039;s a brilliant and elegant point.  Well done, sir!


~David D.G.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen countless examples of people giving God the credit but never the blame in all sorts of things (e.g., &#8220;miraculous&#8221; survival stories in disaster situations), but I have never heard of this &#8220;ultimate superstition&#8221; concept before, in which Jesus gets all the credit for good social development while the rest of humanity gets all the blame for its bad aspects.  It&#8217;s a brilliant and elegant point.  Well done, sir!</p>
<p>~David D.G.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
