<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Theistic critiques of atheism, part 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2009/01/07/theistic-critiques-of-atheism-part-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2009/01/07/theistic-critiques-of-atheism-part-4/</link>
	<description>The theology of Reality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 22:49:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2009/01/07/theistic-critiques-of-atheism-part-4/comment-page-1/#comment-6419</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/?p=644#comment-6419</guid>
		<description>Wonderful insight, Kenneth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful insight, Kenneth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth</title>
		<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2009/01/07/theistic-critiques-of-atheism-part-4/comment-page-1/#comment-6416</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/?p=644#comment-6416</guid>
		<description>When I read Dr. Craig&#039;s remarkes I am humbled.  The awe that I feel comes from experiences as an evangelical minister in which I moved God around on the thelological chess board of my musings (and subsequent teachings).  God thinks this...  God does that...  He wants this from us... etc., etc.

The more I learn about the universe/multiverse the less I understand.  I feel so alienated from people like the good Dr. Craig.  In smug moments I can get really snarky about theology.  And yet I used to be right there doing the same smarmy things, if less elegantly.  

Certainty bias, an emotive feeling that &#039;I know that I know&#039;, comes from a part of the brain separate from our rational thoughts.  It reinforces our sense of rightness through pleasurable mental experience.  The &#039;aha moment&#039; is one example of this range of perceptions.  Everyone experiences this spectrum when they come to &quot;certainty&quot; whether they are right or wrong about the things they are deciding.

Understanding the certainty bias helps me to preserve a better measure of skepticism about what I believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I read Dr. Craig&#8217;s remarkes I am humbled.  The awe that I feel comes from experiences as an evangelical minister in which I moved God around on the thelological chess board of my musings (and subsequent teachings).  God thinks this&#8230;  God does that&#8230;  He wants this from us&#8230; etc., etc.</p>
<p>The more I learn about the universe/multiverse the less I understand.  I feel so alienated from people like the good Dr. Craig.  In smug moments I can get really snarky about theology.  And yet I used to be right there doing the same smarmy things, if less elegantly.  </p>
<p>Certainty bias, an emotive feeling that &#8216;I know that I know&#8217;, comes from a part of the brain separate from our rational thoughts.  It reinforces our sense of rightness through pleasurable mental experience.  The &#8216;aha moment&#8217; is one example of this range of perceptions.  Everyone experiences this spectrum when they come to &#8220;certainty&#8221; whether they are right or wrong about the things they are deciding.</p>
<p>Understanding the certainty bias helps me to preserve a better measure of skepticism about what I believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur</title>
		<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2009/01/07/theistic-critiques-of-atheism-part-4/comment-page-1/#comment-6413</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/?p=644#comment-6413</guid>
		<description>We were just talking about this in math today--what if you divide something and get a remainder?  Do you divide the remainder as well?  Do you accommodate it?  Do you throw it out?

It depends on the story problem you got the math from.  If a big group of people are trying to get across town in little cars, any remainder will need its own car.  If you have a bunch of balloons to distribute among hypersensitive and confrontational friends, any remainder will need to be popped and hidden in your pocket.

Step One:  read the problem.
Step Two:  find the math.
Step Three:  solve the math.

Step Four is the moral:  read the problem again.  Make sure the answer makes sense.  You&#039;re solving a problem, not just pushing numbers around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We were just talking about this in math today&#8211;what if you divide something and get a remainder?  Do you divide the remainder as well?  Do you accommodate it?  Do you throw it out?</p>
<p>It depends on the story problem you got the math from.  If a big group of people are trying to get across town in little cars, any remainder will need its own car.  If you have a bunch of balloons to distribute among hypersensitive and confrontational friends, any remainder will need to be popped and hidden in your pocket.</p>
<p>Step One:  read the problem.<br />
Step Two:  find the math.<br />
Step Three:  solve the math.</p>
<p>Step Four is the moral:  read the problem again.  Make sure the answer makes sense.  You&#8217;re solving a problem, not just pushing numbers around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

