<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TIA Tuesday: The chainsaw runs out of gas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2008/12/23/tia-tuesday-the-chainsaw-runs-out-of-gas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2008/12/23/tia-tuesday-the-chainsaw-runs-out-of-gas/</link>
	<description>The theology of Reality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:15:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Galloway</title>
		<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2008/12/23/tia-tuesday-the-chainsaw-runs-out-of-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-6253</link>
		<dc:creator>Galloway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 14:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/?p=600#comment-6253</guid>
		<description>John Moralles :  &quot; your phraseology is rather teleological and implies volitional agency. (My bold)
Perhaps “outcomes” and “processes” would’ve been better word choices &quot;

Quite correct, John. Thanks .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Moralles :  &#8221; your phraseology is rather teleological and implies volitional agency. (My bold)<br />
Perhaps “outcomes” and “processes” would’ve been better word choices &#8221;</p>
<p>Quite correct, John. Thanks .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Morales</title>
		<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2008/12/23/tia-tuesday-the-chainsaw-runs-out-of-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-6244</link>
		<dc:creator>John Morales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 22:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/?p=600#comment-6244</guid>
		<description>Galloway, excellent comment, but &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;VD: ” . . . but it (Christian atheism) cannot reasonably be described as having its ultimate basis in reason because it has no essential foundation of its own. ”&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Of course it does - survival of the individual and survival of the species, both &lt;b&gt;constructs&lt;/b&gt; of Darwinian evolutionary &lt;b&gt;programming&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
your phraseology is rather teleological and implies volitional agency. (My bold)
Perhaps &quot;outcomes&quot; and &quot;processes&quot; would&#039;ve been better word choices :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Galloway, excellent comment, but<br />
<blockquote>
<blockquote>VD: ” . . . but it (Christian atheism) cannot reasonably be described as having its ultimate basis in reason because it has no essential foundation of its own. ”</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course it does &#8211; survival of the individual and survival of the species, both <b>constructs</b> of Darwinian evolutionary <b>programming</b>.</p></blockquote>
<p>your phraseology is rather teleological and implies volitional agency. (My bold)<br />
Perhaps &#8220;outcomes&#8221; and &#8220;processes&#8221; would&#8217;ve been better word choices <img src='http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Galloway</title>
		<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2008/12/23/tia-tuesday-the-chainsaw-runs-out-of-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-6238</link>
		<dc:creator>Galloway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/?p=600#comment-6238</guid>
		<description>VD: &quot; Although not an atheist, Hitler fully subscribed
 to this philosophy, which is why he is often confused with one; in truth, his paganism was more true to the philosophy&#039;s source than the atheist variants of Lenin, Mao, and the many other communist killers. &quot;

Although not as strident on this point as he once was, nevertheless, in Vox&#039;s mind communist = atheist = mass murderers. If most communists are atheists but most atheists are not communists, then the &#039;key&#039; word in this mass murder correlation is communist, NOT atheist. Otherwise, there would be a clear and discernible difference between the criminal proclivity of atheists and christians. And there is NONE. 


VD: &quot; . . . but it (Christian atheism) cannot reasonably be described as having its ultimate basis in reason because it has no essential foundation of its own. &quot;

Of course it does - survival of the individual and survival of the species, both constructs of Darwinian evolutionary programming.


VD: &quot; It is the towering narcissism that follows from his strict and logical devotion to pure rational materialism which causes the rational atheist to disavow his connection to humanity and calmly embark on a well-reasoned descent into inhuman madness. &quot;

Not just madness, mind you, but &#039;inhuman&#039; madness. I   know lots of atheists and granted, some are a bit weird, but INHUMAN madness? Where does Vox get this stuff? Where&#039;s the data? And since when have atheists disavowed our connection to humanity?
And before Vox starts to fling charges of rational materialism: the last time I checked it was mostly christians out in the malls trying to buy their way out of the Christmas doldrums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VD: &#8221; Although not an atheist, Hitler fully subscribed<br />
 to this philosophy, which is why he is often confused with one; in truth, his paganism was more true to the philosophy&#8217;s source than the atheist variants of Lenin, Mao, and the many other communist killers. &#8221;</p>
<p>Although not as strident on this point as he once was, nevertheless, in Vox&#8217;s mind communist = atheist = mass murderers. If most communists are atheists but most atheists are not communists, then the &#8216;key&#8217; word in this mass murder correlation is communist, NOT atheist. Otherwise, there would be a clear and discernible difference between the criminal proclivity of atheists and christians. And there is NONE. </p>
<p>VD: &#8221; . . . but it (Christian atheism) cannot reasonably be described as having its ultimate basis in reason because it has no essential foundation of its own. &#8221;</p>
<p>Of course it does &#8211; survival of the individual and survival of the species, both constructs of Darwinian evolutionary programming.</p>
<p>VD: &#8221; It is the towering narcissism that follows from his strict and logical devotion to pure rational materialism which causes the rational atheist to disavow his connection to humanity and calmly embark on a well-reasoned descent into inhuman madness. &#8221;</p>
<p>Not just madness, mind you, but &#8216;inhuman&#8217; madness. I   know lots of atheists and granted, some are a bit weird, but INHUMAN madness? Where does Vox get this stuff? Where&#8217;s the data? And since when have atheists disavowed our connection to humanity?<br />
And before Vox starts to fling charges of rational materialism: the last time I checked it was mostly christians out in the malls trying to buy their way out of the Christmas doldrums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
