<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grim to the end</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2008/07/14/grim-to-the-end/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2008/07/14/grim-to-the-end/</link>
	<description>The theology of Reality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 22:49:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: yoyo</title>
		<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2008/07/14/grim-to-the-end/comment-page-1/#comment-978</link>
		<dc:creator>yoyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/?p=398#comment-978</guid>
		<description>I thought this was a good response to Grimms argument, unfortunately it wont change his ideas one iota. leaving aside free will for just a second, the whole &quot;OT is just preparation for the new times&quot; argument makes their god a very strange and profligate beastie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this was a good response to Grimms argument, unfortunately it wont change his ideas one iota. leaving aside free will for just a second, the whole &#8220;OT is just preparation for the new times&#8221; argument makes their god a very strange and profligate beastie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chigliakus</title>
		<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2008/07/14/grim-to-the-end/comment-page-1/#comment-977</link>
		<dc:creator>Chigliakus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/?p=398#comment-977</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not really sure if the good Deacon believes in free will or not, he hasn&#039;t taken any of the bait in the comments section, that&#039;s for sure.  I do know that a fair number of my atheist friends cling to their belief in free will long after they&#039;ve stopped believing in god.  Many people don&#039;t seem to understand that whether free will exists or not, it really doesn&#039;t change much with how you live your life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not really sure if the good Deacon believes in free will or not, he hasn&#8217;t taken any of the bait in the comments section, that&#8217;s for sure.  I do know that a fair number of my atheist friends cling to their belief in free will long after they&#8217;ve stopped believing in god.  Many people don&#8217;t seem to understand that whether free will exists or not, it really doesn&#8217;t change much with how you live your life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B8ovin</title>
		<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2008/07/14/grim-to-the-end/comment-page-1/#comment-975</link>
		<dc:creator>B8ovin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/?p=398#comment-975</guid>
		<description>Jim, I know what you&#039;re saying about the thrust of Grim&#039;s argument, but I don&#039;t think Duncan is limited in his response. Though Grim seems determined to advance only theistic relevance, I think our esteemed blog host can put forth any variety of rebuttal. 
  I&#039;d also like to add behavioral science to the list of disciplines that argue against &quot;free will&quot; particularly in areas of religion, or at least, that free will is the first sacrifice when one surrenders to the &quot;madness of the crowd&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, I know what you&#8217;re saying about the thrust of Grim&#8217;s argument, but I don&#8217;t think Duncan is limited in his response. Though Grim seems determined to advance only theistic relevance, I think our esteemed blog host can put forth any variety of rebuttal.<br />
  I&#8217;d also like to add behavioral science to the list of disciplines that argue against &#8220;free will&#8221; particularly in areas of religion, or at least, that free will is the first sacrifice when one surrenders to the &#8220;madness of the crowd&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2008/07/14/grim-to-the-end/comment-page-1/#comment-972</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/?p=398#comment-972</guid>
		<description>I agree, B8ovin; from a scientific as well as a philosophical standpoint, freewill seems to be a fantasy all around. There are some great articles on the subject over at Naturalism.org...though, I think that&#039;s a separate argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, B8ovin; from a scientific as well as a philosophical standpoint, freewill seems to be a fantasy all around. There are some great articles on the subject over at Naturalism.org&#8230;though, I think that&#8217;s a separate argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B8ovin</title>
		<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2008/07/14/grim-to-the-end/comment-page-1/#comment-971</link>
		<dc:creator>B8ovin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/?p=398#comment-971</guid>
		<description>While I appreciate your attempt to refute Grim&#039;s fairy tales by showing their internal logical inconsistencies, I personally don&#039;t  employ the theistic centered argument alone. Granted, Grim&#039;s post dealt only in the realm of biblical and theistic theory, but there are plenty of scientific rebuttals as well, that would argue against free will in relation to religion. I won&#039;t present those arguments in detail because I think you and your readers probably know them. I will say, however, that it seems the height of hypocrisy for adherents to talk about free will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I appreciate your attempt to refute Grim&#8217;s fairy tales by showing their internal logical inconsistencies, I personally don&#8217;t  employ the theistic centered argument alone. Granted, Grim&#8217;s post dealt only in the realm of biblical and theistic theory, but there are plenty of scientific rebuttals as well, that would argue against free will in relation to religion. I won&#8217;t present those arguments in detail because I think you and your readers probably know them. I will say, however, that it seems the height of hypocrisy for adherents to talk about free will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kennyb</title>
		<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2008/07/14/grim-to-the-end/comment-page-1/#comment-967</link>
		<dc:creator>kennyb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/?p=398#comment-967</guid>
		<description>According to christian theology, the purpose of free will is to make true, freely given bonding (communion) possible.  I bond with my children through continuous, present experience.  Their daily presence and communication does not overwhelm my &quot;faith&quot; in them.  Am I supposed to instead love a family that &quot;acted&quot; 2000 years ago?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to christian theology, the purpose of free will is to make true, freely given bonding (communion) possible.  I bond with my children through continuous, present experience.  Their daily presence and communication does not overwhelm my &#8220;faith&#8221; in them.  Am I supposed to instead love a family that &#8220;acted&#8221; 2000 years ago?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2008/07/14/grim-to-the-end/comment-page-1/#comment-965</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/?p=398#comment-965</guid>
		<description>So, when God sacrificed His One Son,
He then rolled down His sleeves, and was done???
Now, He&#039;ll watch from a distance,
offering no assistance,
and then burn us in Hell...just for fun. 

&#039;Course, it&#039;s OUR fault, for not lending ear
to His silent reproach, for it&#039;s clear
that He&#039;s made His will known
in a dusty old tome
and ONCE in a corn chip (so I hear).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, when God sacrificed His One Son,<br />
He then rolled down His sleeves, and was done???<br />
Now, He&#8217;ll watch from a distance,<br />
offering no assistance,<br />
and then burn us in Hell&#8230;just for fun. </p>
<p>&#8216;Course, it&#8217;s OUR fault, for not lending ear<br />
to His silent reproach, for it&#8217;s clear<br />
that He&#8217;s made His will known<br />
in a dusty old tome<br />
and ONCE in a corn chip (so I hear).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

