<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pro-life materialists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2008/07/07/pro-life-materialists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2008/07/07/pro-life-materialists/</link>
	<description>The theology of Reality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 22:49:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Challenger Grim</title>
		<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2008/07/07/pro-life-materialists/comment-page-1/#comment-863</link>
		<dc:creator>Challenger Grim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 02:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/?p=389#comment-863</guid>
		<description>Curiosity question.

Wouldn&#039;t a completely materialistic view also be against abortion because it violates natural selection and hurts our fitness as a species?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curiosity question.</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t a completely materialistic view also be against abortion because it violates natural selection and hurts our fitness as a species?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chigliakus</title>
		<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2008/07/07/pro-life-materialists/comment-page-1/#comment-841</link>
		<dc:creator>Chigliakus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/?p=389#comment-841</guid>
		<description>Every pro-lifer I&#039;ve ever spoken with has also been pro death penalty, which always seemed like a contradiction in values to me.  I also never really understood the motivations behind the pro-life movement.  I mean I can understand wanting the believers to have more children - you&#039;re breeding more easily-indoctrinated people to join your ranks.  But why prevent non-believers from having an abortion?  From a pragmatic view point it&#039;s advantageous to let the heathen&#039;s ranks diminish while yours swell.

My mother, who is a Christian, used to refer to the bad old days before Roe vs. Wade as the reason she was pro-choice.  I didn&#039;t really understand what she meant until I read this: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/03/health/views/03essa.html?n=Top/Reference/Times%20Topics/Organizations/S/Supreme%20Court
This debate is more complicated than a simple argument for the rights of a non-sentient clump of cells that happen to contain human DNA.  And speaking of human rights, these same pro-lifers all seem to turn a blind eye to the human rights abuses that take place daily across the country in the US penitentiary system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every pro-lifer I&#8217;ve ever spoken with has also been pro death penalty, which always seemed like a contradiction in values to me.  I also never really understood the motivations behind the pro-life movement.  I mean I can understand wanting the believers to have more children &#8211; you&#8217;re breeding more easily-indoctrinated people to join your ranks.  But why prevent non-believers from having an abortion?  From a pragmatic view point it&#8217;s advantageous to let the heathen&#8217;s ranks diminish while yours swell.</p>
<p>My mother, who is a Christian, used to refer to the bad old days before Roe vs. Wade as the reason she was pro-choice.  I didn&#8217;t really understand what she meant until I read this: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/03/health/views/03essa.html?n=Top/Reference/Times%20Topics/Organizations/S/Supreme%20Court" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/03/health/views/03essa.html?n=Top/Reference/Times%20Topics/Organizations/S/Supreme%20Court</a><br />
This debate is more complicated than a simple argument for the rights of a non-sentient clump of cells that happen to contain human DNA.  And speaking of human rights, these same pro-lifers all seem to turn a blind eye to the human rights abuses that take place daily across the country in the US penitentiary system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nevyn</title>
		<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2008/07/07/pro-life-materialists/comment-page-1/#comment-838</link>
		<dc:creator>Nevyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/?p=389#comment-838</guid>
		<description>I was under the impression that the anti-choice folks still believe in &quot;ensoulment&quot; at conception and that&#039;s what makes them persons. One other thing; I&#039;d say that &quot;Abortion is never a good thing&quot; is half right. It&#039;s neither a good thing or a bad thing. If a zygote isn&#039;t a moral agent (or a moral patient for that matter) terminating it seems like it would be neither good nor bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was under the impression that the anti-choice folks still believe in &#8220;ensoulment&#8221; at conception and that&#8217;s what makes them persons. One other thing; I&#8217;d say that &#8220;Abortion is never a good thing&#8221; is half right. It&#8217;s neither a good thing or a bad thing. If a zygote isn&#8217;t a moral agent (or a moral patient for that matter) terminating it seems like it would be neither good nor bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2008/07/07/pro-life-materialists/comment-page-1/#comment-829</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 04:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/?p=389#comment-829</guid>
		<description>Abortion is a good thing.  It&#039;s only because that the circumstances which lead to wanting an abortion are a bad thing (ie. unwanted pregnancy) that it would be great if abortions weren&#039;t wanted any more.  Open heart surgery is also a good thing; it would be great to live in a world where everyone had healthy hearts, but that&#039;s never going to be the case.

Your main point is well-made.  Humans are not zygotes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abortion is a good thing.  It&#8217;s only because that the circumstances which lead to wanting an abortion are a bad thing (ie. unwanted pregnancy) that it would be great if abortions weren&#8217;t wanted any more.  Open heart surgery is also a good thing; it would be great to live in a world where everyone had healthy hearts, but that&#8217;s never going to be the case.</p>
<p>Your main point is well-made.  Humans are not zygotes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/2008/07/07/pro-life-materialists/comment-page-1/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evangelicalrealism.com/?p=389#comment-827</guid>
		<description>Since practically every cell in my body has a copy of my DNA, except for the those little swimmers down there, every time I sneeze I massacre a whole host of persons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since practically every cell in my body has a copy of my DNA, except for the those little swimmers down there, every time I sneeze I massacre a whole host of persons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

