A history of evil

This isn’t strictly a TIA post, but it is prompted by Vox Day’s remarks about what he calls the “bloody history” of atheism, and also by his complaints that it’s not fair to blame Christianity for things like the Crusades and the Inquisition and the Catholic/Protestant wars and so on. But first I want to talk about something much, much worse, an evil so vile and corrupt that it has killed, maimed, and tortured more people than atheism and Christianity combined. I am speaking, of course, of asantanism.

Not all Nazis were atheists, but they were all asantanists. Not all Crusaders were Christians, but they were all asantanists. Communists under Stalin, Lenin and Mao? Asantanists all. Witch-burners, inquisitionists, defenders of the faith in whatever form: asantanists. Every mass-murderer, everyone who became famous for the cruelty and inhumanity of his or her atrocities, was an asantanist. Of all the people whose names have become synonymous with injustice and evil, not one of them believed in Santa Claus.

I mention this because you so often hear Christians blame atheism for things like the Holocaust and the gulags, as though lack of belief motivated people to do evil things. But when you look at the history of evil, you will notice that the common thread is not a lack of belief in God, but a lack of belief in Santa. If you’re going to blame unbelief for the actions of unbelievers, therefore, you ought to be blaming asantanism, not atheism.

But that’s rather silly, isn’t it? People are motivated by what they do believe, not by what they don’t. Indeed, the whole point of religion is to change how people behave, by changing what they believe. Motivating people to good behavior, and to abstain from bad behavior, is what religion is all about. That’s why religion has weekly meetings at which believers are exhorted to turn from sin and to produce the fruits of faith, and why religions have full-time paid clergy to counsel with people and encourage them and rebuke them when they’re wrong, and why they have Scriptures and other teachings about how man ought to live to be pleasing to the deity or deities involved.

It’s perfectly appropriate, therefore, to look at the behavior of religious people to see if the religion is producing the changes it is supposed to produce. It’s no different from someone on a diet weighing themselves to see if the diet is producing the weight loss it promises. When you look at the behavior of religious people, you’re just checking to see if the religion is really being effective at what it claims to do. And if it doesn’t, if we see religious people burning witches and holding Inquisitions and leading Crusades and so on, then we’re justified in taking that as an indicator that religion is ineffective at best, if not an outright fraud.

When people blame unbelief for bad behavior, what they’re really claiming is that the person’s behavior would be better if they believed. When we look at the actual behavior of believers, however, we do not find this to be the case, because the believers’ record is no better. And even if the unbeliever’s behavior was worse, how would we know which unbelief to blame for their behavior? Lack of belief in God can be linked to only some of the notable crimes of history, but lack of belief in Santa is common to all of them.

Religion is designed to make a difference in people’s behavior. Atheism isn’t; it’s just the absence of belief in God. That’s why atheism does not have churches or preachers or Scriptures or any of the other things religion uses to guide and motivate people’s behavior. And that’s why it’s appropriate to evaluate religion in terms of the behavior of believers, and irrelevant to try and blame the behavior of unbelievers on their unbelief. And if you can’t agree with that, it’s probably because you’re one of those evil, lying, murderous asantanists. So there.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Posted in Society, TIA, Unapologetics. 5 Comments »

5 Responses to “A history of evil”

  1. physicalist Says:

    Great post; I’m bookmarking it for future reference.

  2. Ateism och asantanism « Utan titel Says:

    […] En replik på det ifrågasätter om det verkligen är vettigt att klassificera människor och system baserat på vad de inte tror på. Deacon Duncan på bloggen Evangelical Realism hävdar humoristiskt att man kan lika gärna skylla de flesta förbrytelser på “asantanism”, nämligen det att inte tro på jultomten. Låt oss titta närmare på argumentet. […]

  3. tetris4 Says:

    This is the gist of my argument above:

    Which unbelief to blame for “bad” behaviour? The unbelief that you will be punished for it! This can then have several reasons:

    You believe that your actions are, in fact, good. (Let’s face it, people do have different morals.)

    You believe that your actions, while in principle bad, serve a good cause and are therefore justified.

    You believe that the correcting instrument, be it your parents, the police, Santa Claus, the neighbours or God, will either not find out or not care.

    This unbelief goes through both atheists and christians. So, as usual in apologetics, the world is more complicated than either part likes to admit.

  4. Deacon Duncan Says:

    Thanks for the translation. My Swedish is pretty rusty (as in I don’t speak a word of it!).

    I appreciate your argument, but I would add that if you believe you will escape punishment for some action, that’s a belief, not an unbelief. And secondly, even if it were an unbelief, the fact that you do not expect to be punished only influences whether you will do it; it does not tell you what thing you want to do. So the actual motive, the actual idea of what you want to do, comes from some other thing, not from your unbelief.

    I think, though, that you are 100% correct about how complicated things are.

  5. » TIA Tuesday: The Santa Clause II Evangelical Realism Says:

    […] than that, Vox’s argument is based on an assumption that is merely silly, as we’ve seen before. Lack of belief in God, like a lack of belief in Santa Claus, is an absence of motivation. […]